Zen

Translation

English type: Plain text
`rpmdeplint` is a generic test that tries to identify problems in RPM packages in the context of their dependency graph.
0/1200 · 120

Sign in to save the translation.

English French Actions
Generic Tests
 
Generic tests are tests that don't check only specific components (e.g. "dnf" or "kernel") but can be typically applied to all artifacts of a certain type. An example of such a test could be a test that can be run on all RPM builds in a Bodhi update.
 
Fedora CI currently provides 3 generic tests. All of them run on packages that are being pushed to Rawhide via automatic Bodhi updates.
 
rpmdeplint
 
`rpmdeplint` is a generic test that tries to identify problems in RPM packages in the context of their dependency graph.
 
There are four different checks that the test performs:
 
check-sat
 
This checks if all runtime dependencies of the given RPM packages would be satisfied if the packages are pushed to the given repository (like Rawhide).
 
check-repoclosure
 
This is similar to check check-sat test, but check-repoclosure checks that all packages in the given repository that don't have any runtime dependency problems before the new packages are added, won't have any dependency problems after the packages are added to the repository.
 
Packages are only considered to be available for dependency resolution if they are the latest version and not obsoleted by any other package. Therefore this check can detect problems where a package under test is updating an existing package in the repository, but it no longer provides a requirement needed by some other package in the repository.
 
Packages with pre-existing repoclosure problems are ignored.
 
check-conflicts
 
This checks for undeclared file conflicts in the given RPM packages: that is when one of the given packages contains a file which is also contained in some other package.
 
This command will not report a file as conflicting between two packages if:
 
there is an explicit RPM Conflicts between the two packages; or
 
the file’s checksum, permissions, owner, and group are identical in both packages (RPM allows both packages to own the file in this case); or
 
the file’s color is different between the two packages (RPM will silently resolve the conflict in favor of the 64-bit file).
 
Sometimes files can be owned by literally thousands of different packages. In order to properly check that there are no file conflicts, `rpmdeplint` would need to download all other packages. This would be very slow, so only a single other package is downloaded and checked.
 
check-upgrade
 

Loading…

No matching activity found.
Browse all string changes

Glossary

English French
No related strings found in the glossary.

String information

Source string description
type: Plain text
Source string location
pages/generic_tests.adoc:17
String age
3 years ago
Last updated
11 months ago
Source string age
3 years ago
Translation file
po/fr/master/pages/generic_tests.po, string 5